top of page
Case Summaries
Case Summary: TikTok Inc., et al. v. Merrick B. Garland, Nos. 24–656 and 24–657 (U.S. Jan. 17, 2025)
Case Summary: TikTok Inc., et al. v. Merrick B. Garland, Nos. 24–656 and 24–657 (U.S. Jan. 17, 2025) Written by Charles Webb Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) TikTok has grown to become a widely recognized short-form video sharing platform in the United States, with six out of ten adults under age 30 saying they us
Maclain Conlin
May 5
Case Summary: Barrett v. United States, No. 24-5774 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2026)
Case Summary: Barrett v. United States, No. 24-5774 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2026) Written by Patrick Keegan Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In the case of Barrett v. United States, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), Dwayne Barrett, a getaway driver in a string of 2011-2012 New York armed robberies, was arrested and indicted on seven ch
Maclain Conlin
May 5
Case Summary: A.A.R.P. v. Trump, No. 24A1007 (U.S. May 16, 2025)
Case Summary: A.A.R.P. v. Trump, No. 24A1007 (U.S. May 16, 2025) Written by Margaux Alvarez Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In April 2025, two Venezuelan nationals who were being detained in the United States filed for emergency relief to stop their imminent removal under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA). They brought
Margaux Alvarez
Apr 21
Case Summary: Chiles v. Salazar, No. 24–539 (U.S. March 31, 2026)
Case Summary: Chiles v. Salazar, No. 24–539 (U.S. March 31, 2026) Written by Rylie DeWeese Edited by Olivia Oefinger & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor in Colorado who employs talk therapy with her clients, filed suit in federal court against Colo. Rev. Stat. §12–245–224(1)(t)(V) (2025), a law “prohi
Rylie DeWeese
Apr 16
Case Summary: Case v. Montana, No. 24-624 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2026)
Case Summary: Case v. Montana, No. 24-624 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2026) Written by Marleni Velazquez Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In September 2021, Montana resident William Case placed a phone call to his ex-girlfriend, J.H. During the conversation, Case told her that he would commit suicide and leave
Marleni Velazquez
Apr 15
Case Summary: Goldey v. Fields, No. 24-809 (U.S. June 30, 2025)
Case Summary: Goldey v. Fields, No. 24-809 (U.S. June 30, 2025) Written by Brooke Clary Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In June 2025, the Supreme Court declined to recognize an implied right to sue for excessive force against federal prison personnel under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.[1
Brooke Clary
Apr 9
Case Summary: Baird v. Bonta, No. 24-565 (9th Cir. Jan 2, 2026)
Case Summary: Baird v. Bonta, No. 24-565 (9th Cir. Jan 2, 2026) Written by Delaney Grimaldi Edited by Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) Baird v. Bonta, No. 24-565 (9th Cir. 2026) involves Mark Baird, a law-abiding citizen of California seeking to openly carry a firearm in public for self-defense purposes.[1] California Penal Code sections
Delaney Grimaldi
Mar 22
Case Summary: Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 (U.S. June 5, 2025)
Case Summary: Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 (U.S. June 5, 2025) Written By Laura Rucks Edited by Olivia Oefinger & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, was hired by the Ohio Department of Youth Services in 2004.[1] During her employment there she filled different roles eventually being promo
Laura Rucks
Mar 2
Case Summary: Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, No. 25A269 (U.S. Sept. 26, 2025)
Case Summary: Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, No. 25A269 (U.S. Sept. 26, 2025) Written by Megan Borsos Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order No. 14169, titled “Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid,” ordering a 90-day pa
Megan Borsos
Feb 22
Case Summary: Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 (U.S. June 5, 2025)
Case Summary: Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 (U.S. June 5, 2025) Written by Cole Kinley Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In 2021, the Mexican Government filed a lawsuit against seven American firearm manufacturers, claiming that the companies’ negligent distribution led
Cole Kinley
Jan 26
Case Summary: Trump v. Orr, No. 25A319 (U.S. Nov. 6, 2025)
Case Summary: Trump v. Orr, No. 25A319 (U.S. Nov. 6, 2025) Written by Ava-Coleman Diegel Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) In February 2025, seven transgender and nonbinary individuals filed a lawsuit challenging the new Passport Policy implemented by the Trump administration, which required that a person’s s
Ava-Coleman Diegel
Dec 31, 2025
Case Summary: Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 (U.S. June 27, 2025)
Case Summary: Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 (U.S. June 27, 2025) Written by Hailey Herzog Edited by Madeline Leonard & Maclain Conlin (All views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Clemson Law Review or its leadership.) This past January, the Supreme Court ruled on Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 (U.S. June 27, 2025), a case concerning Texas H.B. 1181 (2023), which requ
Hailey Herzog
Dec 30, 2025
bottom of page